<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: General Network Error</title>
	<atom:link href="http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/6/general-network-error/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/6/general-network-error/</link>
	<description>surfing on the bleeding edge of technology, food, and spirituality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:18:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nurm</title>
		<link>http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/6/general-network-error/comment-page-1/#comment-33368</link>
		<dc:creator>Nurm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/6/general-network-error/#comment-33368</guid>
		<description>Heh, wait till you get to .Net 2.0 and SQL 2005.  MS have removed the General Network Error, and replaced it with the fact that sometimes (I&#039;m guessing whenever the General Network Error used to occur), you just get no data back from a SQL call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:7f334f6650dc991c9bb8d70e41178a16356baf21'>
<p>Heh, wait till you get to .Net 2.0 and SQL 2005.  MS have removed the General Network Error, and replaced it with the fact that sometimes (I&#8217;m guessing whenever the General Network Error used to occur), you just get no data back from a SQL call.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/6/general-network-error/comment-page-1/#comment-33299</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 02:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/6/general-network-error/#comment-33299</guid>
		<description>OK, I am also one of the not so few who as this annoying problem.  Probably due to my messy home network where my Sql Server resides.  Everything was fine for a few days and then General Network Error on some of my ASP.NET pages.  I tried all the fixes, pool size, timeouts, etc.  The answer is this:  You have to use OleDb instead of SqlClient.

--snip--

Oh now I&#039;m really mad.  That didn&#039;t work either, I get a new error:  [DBNETLIB][ConnectionWrite (send()).]General network error. Check your network documentation.

--snip--

My workaround for now: I turned my query into a stored procedure, changing the commandtype, of course too and now Ole and Sql do not choke with all these dumb errors.  I tested both using Ole and using Sql and sure enough in both ASP.NET pages where I had this problem I was using just slightly complex queries, nothing too fancy, but more than the usual and converting them to stored procedures was enough of a fix that things run smoothly now.  Kind of like just giving the car a little tune up to get it running again.  This is definitely a Microsoft issue and I&#039;m surprised that they are not &#039;fessing up to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:437cc6ab1d46c1dd6f2a2a6d16684a1b2c2b7b74'>
<p>OK, I am also one of the not so few who as this annoying problem.  Probably due to my messy home network where my Sql Server resides.  Everything was fine for a few days and then General Network Error on some of my ASP.NET pages.  I tried all the fixes, pool size, timeouts, etc.  The answer is this:  You have to use OleDb instead of SqlClient.</p>
<p>&#8211;snip&#8211;</p>
<p>Oh now I&#8217;m really mad.  That didn&#8217;t work either, I get a new error:  [DBNETLIB][ConnectionWrite (send()).]General network error. Check your network documentation.</p>
<p>&#8211;snip&#8211;</p>
<p>My workaround for now: I turned my query into a stored procedure, changing the commandtype, of course too and now Ole and Sql do not choke with all these dumb errors.  I tested both using Ole and using Sql and sure enough in both ASP.NET pages where I had this problem I was using just slightly complex queries, nothing too fancy, but more than the usual and converting them to stored procedures was enough of a fix that things run smoothly now.  Kind of like just giving the car a little tune up to get it running again.  This is definitely a Microsoft issue and I&#8217;m surprised that they are not &#8216;fessing up to it.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/6/general-network-error/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/6/general-network-error/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.devshed.com/archive/52/2003/1/4/49612&quot;&gt;http://forums.devshed.com/archive/52/2003/1/4/49612&lt;/a&gt;


Found the above post to be pertinent.  

Regards,
Alex Fiedler
cogita.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:607de0505461eaea67c934e267429483ee886a15'>
<p><a href="http://forums.devshed.com/archive/52/2003/1/4/49612">http://forums.devshed.com/archive/52/2003/1/4/49612</a></p>
<p>Found the above post to be pertinent.  </p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Alex Fiedler<br />
cogita.com</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
